Dashr Forum

Analysis of the goal prediction: Analyzing the recent matches, in the last 5 away matches of Malavan, 7 out of the last 8 matches of Malavan, 5 out of the last 6 home matches of Naft Masjed Soleyman, and 4 out of the last 5 matches of Naft Masjed Soleyman, and 6 out of the last 8 head-to-head matches have had a maximum of 2 goals scored. Therefore, it is likely that the match at the stadium will have a maximum of 2 goals. If you're looking to win big with your next soccer bet, high odds soccer tips offer a great way to take advantage of lucrative markets and maximize your profits. Head-to-head analysis: The history of head-to-head matches shows that in the 3 recent away matches at Naft Masjed Soleyman's home ground, Malavan drew 2 and lost 1. 2 out of the 3 matches had at least 3 goals scored. In the overall 8 previous head-to-head matches, Naft Masjed Soleyman has won 1, drawn 5, and lost 2. 6 out of the 8 matches had a maximum of 2 goals scored. Form analysis: Naft Masjed Soleyman has not won in 9 out of their last 10 matches and in 4 out of their last 5 matches. At home, Naft Masjed Soleyman has not won in 9 out of their last 10 matches and in 4 out of their last 5 matches. Malavan has not won in 10 out of their last 10 matches and in all of their last 5 matches. Away from home, Malavan has not won in 10 out of their last 10 matches and in all of their last 5 matches. Looking for free tips 1x2 today ? Our team of experts provides daily recommendations and predictions for a variety of markets, including some with potentially high payouts. Asian handicap analysis: Naft Masjed Soleyman has not won in 6 out of their last 10 matches based on the Asian handicap, but they have won in 3 out of their last 5 matches. At home, Naft Masjed Soleyman has not won in 7 out of their last 10 matches based on the Asian handicap, and they have not won in 3 out of their last 5 matches. Malavan has not won in 8 out of their last 10 matches based on the Asian handicap, and they have not won in 3 out of their last 5 matches. Away from home, Malavan has not won in 6 out of their last 10 matches based on the Asian handicap, and they have not won in 4 out of their last 5 matches. Over/Under analysis: According to the over/under goal market, Naft Masjed Soleyman has had under 2.5 goals in 6 out of their last 10 matches and in 4 out of their last 5 matches. At home, Naft Masjed Soleyman has had under 2.5 goals in 6 out of their last 10 matches and in 4 out of their last 5 matches. Malavan has had over 2.5 goals in 7 out of their last 10 matches and in 3 out of their last 5 matches. Away from home, Malavan has had over 2.5 goals in 5 out of their last 10 matches and in 3 out of their last 5 matches. Prediction by I Bóng Đá for Naft Masjed Soleyman vs Malavan: • Selection: Malavan (-1/2). • Over/Under prediction: Under. • Score prediction: 0-1. Looking for an extremely effective badminton betting method? https://wintips.com/extremely-effective-badminton-betting-method-at-a-reputable-bookmaker/

We get this question a lot. Electronic timing exists to improve accuracy and consistency when compared to hand timing. Research shows (ref 1, 2) that experienced coaches timing the 40 yard dash are off by an average of 0.22-0.31 sec when compared to hand timing. Why is this? Reaction time! When you see the athlete move, information travels from sensory cells called neurons from the eye to the brain's visual cortex, an area devoted to understanding what you see. Next, the motor cortex—the part of the brain that directs movement—has to send signals along your spinal cord and to your arm, hand and finger muscles, telling them to respond in the proper sequence to press a button on the stopwatch. The average reaction time is 0.15-0.30 sec. (ref 3) but that takes into account physical, audio, and visual stimuli. The reaction time for a physical interaction is closer to 0.15 sec as the “knee jerk” reaction is directed by the spinal cord as opposed to the brain – shortening up the distance and computation needed to react. Audio reactions are about 0.17 sec, and visual – which is the case in timing – is typically at least 0.25 sec (ref 4). But if I start the clock 0.3 sec after the athlete starts, and then stop it 0.3 sec after the athlete crosses the finish – won’t that cancel out? Sure – but it doesn't work that way. The start is where you are reacting to movement. At the finish you are anticipating the athlete crossing the line so your brain is calculating when to press the button based off how fast the athlete is moving. As a result, there is a lot less error at the finish – so they do not cancel out. There you have it! That is why you see a difference in hand timing vs. laser timing. Another thing that can greatly impact the accuracy and consistency of hand timing are distraction. There are a lot of distractions when testing athletes. “Coach what was my time?”, directing athletes to get up to the line, coaching them up on how to start, etc. These distractions were limited in the referenced articles, so even though a ~0.3 sec average difference was recorded, it has the potential to be much further off. References 1. Comparison Between Hand and Electronic Timing of 40-yd Dash Performance in College Football Players 2. Validity and reliability of hand and electronic timing for 40-yd sprint in college football players 3. Speedy Science: How Fast Can You React? 4. Human Reaction Time | Forces & Motion | Physics | FuseSchool The Dashr timing system has been validated for accuracy and consistency. See this article for reference.

I added all my athletes to my roster on the Dashboard on my computer, but when I go to use the app, there are no athletes. It shows I have used roster spots, but there is no list of kids to pick from when I test. As a result, I just write down their results and put them into a spreadsheet that I send out weekly. But this is an extra 20 minutes for me every time we test and if I paid for the roster spots, I'd like to use them! I deleted and reinstalled the app already. I am on Dashr 2023 : Version 2.3.9.